Improving an operational KPI does not, by itself, improve business performance. A more accurate demand forecast, lower logistics costs, or a higher service level only create value when they improve decisions that affect revenue, margin, working capital, risk, or the company’s ability to grow.
This is the logic behind Supply Chain Value Dynamics: treating supply chain as a system of interdependent decisions that connects business strategy, operations, inventory, and financial performance. In this model, artificial intelligence supports decision-making rather than being treated as an end in itself.
Decisions around demand, procurement, production, inventory, logistics networks, and service levels are directly connected. A lower-cost supplier, for example, may require a longer lead time. The purchasing benefit may therefore come with greater exposure to delays, higher variability, and the need for additional inventory. Similarly, increasing service levels may help protect sales, but it also requires the capacity and inventory to sustain them.
As a result, optimizing a KPI in isolation can undermine overall performance. Procurement may reduce costs while increasing capital tied up in inventory. Commercial teams may raise service levels without fully considering their cost. The central issue is therefore how to evaluate these trade-offs against a common reference point: the value created for the business.
Inventory appears across almost every part of the supply chain. Demand determines how much product will be needed, procurement brings materials into the operation, manufacturing creates inventory, the network determines where it should be positioned, and fulfillment takes it to the customer.
This helps explain why improving forecast accuracy in isolation may have limited impact. A better forecast only creates value when it leads to better decisions about how much to buy, produce, hold, or replenish.
Inventory is also working capital. It must be financed, while at the same time supporting product availability, sales, and service levels. Reducing the capital required to sustain a given service level can release cash and allow the business to grow with less need for additional financing.
Different technologies play different roles. Analytical models such as machine learning, optimization, and simulation can support quantitative decisions related to demand, inventory, production, capacity, and network design. Generative AI can complement these models by making it easier to interact with information and analysis.
The starting point, however, should be the decision. Before choosing the technology, organizations need to identify which decision should be improved, which alternatives need to be compared, what constraints must be considered, and how the outcome will be measured.
Responsibility remains human. A model can recommend, but managers still need to define objectives, boundaries, exceptions, and decision rules. The distinction is important: value does not lie simply in the model, but in the decision the model helps improve.
Integrating data is not enough if each function continues to optimize a different objective. Supply Chain may focus on lower costs, Commercial on higher availability, and Finance on lower working capital. Without a common logic for evaluating these choices, the company can achieve strong local results while underperforming overall.
Integrated planning therefore also requires aligned objectives, clear decision rights, and metrics that translate operational choices into impacts on cost, revenue, service, capital, and risk.
There is no need to start by building a complete system connecting every decision in the company. A more practical approach is to identify decisions with high economic potential and relatively low implementation effort, establish the current baseline, and begin with the data required to improve that specific decision.
Perfect data is not a prerequisite. Using the model itself helps identify which information needs to improve over time. The starting point should be the decision to improve, rather than the technology or the availability of an ideal data foundation.
Metrics such as forecast accuracy, service level, inventory turnover, and logistics costs remain important, but they need to be linked to the economic consequences of the decisions behind them.
A more efficient supply chain can release working capital, protect revenue, reduce costs, or support growth. Artificial intelligence expands the ability to compare alternatives and understand these trade-offs, provided it is embedded in a decision-making process with clear objectives and measurable impact.
Starting with the decision, and then defining the data, models, and technology required to support it, is generally more effective than starting with the tool and looking for a problem to apply it to.
A LTPlabs ajuda as empresas a responder a estes desafios através da conceção de um ecossistema de gestão de dados-mestre adaptado aos seus processos, à sua informação e aos seus utilizadores.
A IA pode ajudar as organizações da cadeia de abastecimento a reduzir o desfasamento entre o planeamento e a execução.
O papel do Analytics na transformação sustentável das empresas
Navegando pelo futuro do S&OP
Aprimorando o alinhamento organizacional e a otimização de recursos por meio de S&OP integrado
Como as equipes de planejamento podem extrair o máximo valor dos modelos analíticos de S&OP.