
The most common mistakes in GenAI adoption
Why organizations that start by asking "how do we automate this?" often end up frustrated and what to ask instead.
How planning teams can extract maximum value from S&OP analytical models.

LTPlabs has developed several integrated sales and operations planning (S&OP) projects over the years, with impacts ranging from increased sales forecast accuracy to more efficient operations planning. These projects have been carried out in various sectors, such as consumer goods and manufacturing, showcasing the advantages that organizations can derive from the use of analytical models in their planning processes.
New challenges and opportunities have emerged in recent times. While volatile contexts bring greater complexity to decision-makers, the emergence of new analytical techniques opens unprecedented opportunities for strengthening planning activities.
The past few years have been marked by significant disruptions in supply chains, ranging from raw material shortages to the effects of the pandemic and, more recently, the inflationary crisis. Simultaneously, business models have evolved, and consequently, organizational planning has become more complex. Here are some examples:
Faced with these difficulties, should companies give up on the effort to achieve integrated planning across functions? Does the high level of uncertainty make convergence difficult, and does the rapid pace of change render planning efforts futile? Or, on the other hand, should companies adopt integrated planning practices that enable them to gain a competitive edge and align their responses to the market? The latter option should prevail, particularly because different opportunities have emerged to leverage planning dynamics.
Here are some examples:
Analytical models are increasingly becoming an integral part of organizations seeking high maturity in S&OP practices, as they provide a necessary mechanism for managing highly complex problems that can be facilitated through historical data and information.
Ensuring the successful adoption of analytical models is not an easy task. According to a recent study, only 11% of organizations were able to derive financial results from the application of analytical models. One of the mechanisms that maximizes implementation success is through the establishment of Organizational Learning with AI – creating conditions for mutual learning between human decision-makers and analytical models.
Organizations with better performance are those that utilize human-model interaction to continually refine the process and outcomes.
In the context of S&OP, this human-model interaction is equally essential. In fact, the levels of maturity that a company can aspire to, as described, encompass not only the Information Technology dimension (model dimension) but also the softer dimensions of Meetings and Collaboration and Organization, which are related to decision-making support processes (human dimension). Therefore, finding appropriate mechanisms for learning and communication is key to ensuring the successful adoption of newly developed models.
A potential alignment between humans and models in the S&OP area can be established in six steps: